Current File : //opt/rh/rh-python35/root/lib64/python3.5/email/feedparser.py
# Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Python Software Foundation
# Authors: Baxter, Wouters and Warsaw
# Contact: email-sig@python.org
"""FeedParser - An email feed parser.
The feed parser implements an interface for incrementally parsing an email
message, line by line. This has advantages for certain applications, such as
those reading email messages off a socket.
FeedParser.feed() is the primary interface for pushing new data into the
parser. It returns when there's nothing more it can do with the available
data. When you have no more data to push into the parser, call .close().
This completes the parsing and returns the root message object.
The other advantage of this parser is that it will never raise a parsing
exception. Instead, when it finds something unexpected, it adds a 'defect' to
the current message. Defects are just instances that live on the message
object's .defects attribute.
"""
__all__ = ['FeedParser', 'BytesFeedParser']
import re
from email import errors
from email import message
from email._policybase import compat32
from collections import deque
NLCRE = re.compile('\r\n|\r|\n')
NLCRE_bol = re.compile('(\r\n|\r|\n)')
NLCRE_eol = re.compile('(\r\n|\r|\n)\Z')
NLCRE_crack = re.compile('(\r\n|\r|\n)')
# RFC 2822 $3.6.8 Optional fields. ftext is %d33-57 / %d59-126, Any character
# except controls, SP, and ":".
headerRE = re.compile(r'^(From |[\041-\071\073-\176]*:|[\t ])')
EMPTYSTRING = ''
NL = '\n'
NeedMoreData = object()
class BufferedSubFile(object):
"""A file-ish object that can have new data loaded into it.
You can also push and pop line-matching predicates onto a stack. When the
current predicate matches the current line, a false EOF response
(i.e. empty string) is returned instead. This lets the parser adhere to a
simple abstraction -- it parses until EOF closes the current message.
"""
def __init__(self):
# Chunks of the last partial line pushed into this object.
self._partial = []
# A deque of full, pushed lines
self._lines = deque()
# The stack of false-EOF checking predicates.
self._eofstack = []
# A flag indicating whether the file has been closed or not.
self._closed = False
def push_eof_matcher(self, pred):
self._eofstack.append(pred)
def pop_eof_matcher(self):
return self._eofstack.pop()
def close(self):
# Don't forget any trailing partial line.
self.pushlines(''.join(self._partial).splitlines(True))
self._partial = []
self._closed = True
def readline(self):
if not self._lines:
if self._closed:
return ''
return NeedMoreData
# Pop the line off the stack and see if it matches the current
# false-EOF predicate.
line = self._lines.popleft()
# RFC 2046, section 5.1.2 requires us to recognize outer level
# boundaries at any level of inner nesting. Do this, but be sure it's
# in the order of most to least nested.
for ateof in reversed(self._eofstack):
if ateof(line):
# We're at the false EOF. But push the last line back first.
self._lines.appendleft(line)
return ''
return line
def unreadline(self, line):
# Let the consumer push a line back into the buffer.
assert line is not NeedMoreData
self._lines.appendleft(line)
def push(self, data):
"""Push some new data into this object."""
# Crack into lines, but preserve the linesep characters on the end of each
parts = data.splitlines(True)
if not parts or not parts[0].endswith(('\n', '\r')):
# No new complete lines, so just accumulate partials
self._partial += parts
return
if self._partial:
# If there are previous leftovers, complete them now
self._partial.append(parts[0])
parts[0:1] = ''.join(self._partial).splitlines(True)
del self._partial[:]
# If the last element of the list does not end in a newline, then treat
# it as a partial line. We only check for '\n' here because a line
# ending with '\r' might be a line that was split in the middle of a
# '\r\n' sequence (see bugs 1555570 and 1721862).
if not parts[-1].endswith('\n'):
self._partial = [parts.pop()]
self.pushlines(parts)
def pushlines(self, lines):
self._lines.extend(lines)
def __iter__(self):
return self
def __next__(self):
line = self.readline()
if line == '':
raise StopIteration
return line
class FeedParser:
"""A feed-style parser of email."""
def __init__(self, _factory=None, *, policy=compat32):
"""_factory is called with no arguments to create a new message obj
The policy keyword specifies a policy object that controls a number of
aspects of the parser's operation. The default policy maintains
backward compatibility.
"""
self.policy = policy
self._factory_kwds = lambda: {'policy': self.policy}
if _factory is None:
# What this should be:
#self._factory = policy.default_message_factory
# but, because we are post 3.4 feature freeze, fix with temp hack:
if self.policy is compat32:
self._factory = message.Message
else:
self._factory = message.EmailMessage
else:
self._factory = _factory
try:
_factory(policy=self.policy)
except TypeError:
# Assume this is an old-style factory
self._factory_kwds = lambda: {}
self._input = BufferedSubFile()
self._msgstack = []
self._parse = self._parsegen().__next__
self._cur = None
self._last = None
self._headersonly = False
# Non-public interface for supporting Parser's headersonly flag
def _set_headersonly(self):
self._headersonly = True
def feed(self, data):
"""Push more data into the parser."""
self._input.push(data)
self._call_parse()
def _call_parse(self):
try:
self._parse()
except StopIteration:
pass
def close(self):
"""Parse all remaining data and return the root message object."""
self._input.close()
self._call_parse()
root = self._pop_message()
assert not self._msgstack
# Look for final set of defects
if root.get_content_maintype() == 'multipart' \
and not root.is_multipart():
defect = errors.MultipartInvariantViolationDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(root, defect)
return root
def _new_message(self):
msg = self._factory(**self._factory_kwds())
if self._cur and self._cur.get_content_type() == 'multipart/digest':
msg.set_default_type('message/rfc822')
if self._msgstack:
self._msgstack[-1].attach(msg)
self._msgstack.append(msg)
self._cur = msg
self._last = msg
def _pop_message(self):
retval = self._msgstack.pop()
if self._msgstack:
self._cur = self._msgstack[-1]
else:
self._cur = None
return retval
def _parsegen(self):
# Create a new message and start by parsing headers.
self._new_message()
headers = []
# Collect the headers, searching for a line that doesn't match the RFC
# 2822 header or continuation pattern (including an empty line).
for line in self._input:
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
if not headerRE.match(line):
# If we saw the RFC defined header/body separator
# (i.e. newline), just throw it away. Otherwise the line is
# part of the body so push it back.
if not NLCRE.match(line):
defect = errors.MissingHeaderBodySeparatorDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
self._input.unreadline(line)
break
headers.append(line)
# Done with the headers, so parse them and figure out what we're
# supposed to see in the body of the message.
self._parse_headers(headers)
# Headers-only parsing is a backwards compatibility hack, which was
# necessary in the older parser, which could raise errors. All
# remaining lines in the input are thrown into the message body.
if self._headersonly:
lines = []
while True:
line = self._input.readline()
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
if line == '':
break
lines.append(line)
self._cur.set_payload(EMPTYSTRING.join(lines))
return
if self._cur.get_content_type() == 'message/delivery-status':
# message/delivery-status contains blocks of headers separated by
# a blank line. We'll represent each header block as a separate
# nested message object, but the processing is a bit different
# than standard message/* types because there is no body for the
# nested messages. A blank line separates the subparts.
while True:
self._input.push_eof_matcher(NLCRE.match)
for retval in self._parsegen():
if retval is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
break
msg = self._pop_message()
# We need to pop the EOF matcher in order to tell if we're at
# the end of the current file, not the end of the last block
# of message headers.
self._input.pop_eof_matcher()
# The input stream must be sitting at the newline or at the
# EOF. We want to see if we're at the end of this subpart, so
# first consume the blank line, then test the next line to see
# if we're at this subpart's EOF.
while True:
line = self._input.readline()
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
break
while True:
line = self._input.readline()
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
break
if line == '':
break
# Not at EOF so this is a line we're going to need.
self._input.unreadline(line)
return
if self._cur.get_content_maintype() == 'message':
# The message claims to be a message/* type, then what follows is
# another RFC 2822 message.
for retval in self._parsegen():
if retval is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
break
self._pop_message()
return
if self._cur.get_content_maintype() == 'multipart':
boundary = self._cur.get_boundary()
if boundary is None:
# The message /claims/ to be a multipart but it has not
# defined a boundary. That's a problem which we'll handle by
# reading everything until the EOF and marking the message as
# defective.
defect = errors.NoBoundaryInMultipartDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
lines = []
for line in self._input:
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
lines.append(line)
self._cur.set_payload(EMPTYSTRING.join(lines))
return
# Make sure a valid content type was specified per RFC 2045:6.4.
if (self._cur.get('content-transfer-encoding', '8bit').lower()
not in ('7bit', '8bit', 'binary')):
defect = errors.InvalidMultipartContentTransferEncodingDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
# Create a line match predicate which matches the inter-part
# boundary as well as the end-of-multipart boundary. Don't push
# this onto the input stream until we've scanned past the
# preamble.
separator = '--' + boundary
boundaryre = re.compile(
'(?P<sep>' + re.escape(separator) +
r')(?P<end>--)?(?P<ws>[ \t]*)(?P<linesep>\r\n|\r|\n)?$')
capturing_preamble = True
preamble = []
linesep = False
close_boundary_seen = False
while True:
line = self._input.readline()
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
if line == '':
break
mo = boundaryre.match(line)
if mo:
# If we're looking at the end boundary, we're done with
# this multipart. If there was a newline at the end of
# the closing boundary, then we need to initialize the
# epilogue with the empty string (see below).
if mo.group('end'):
close_boundary_seen = True
linesep = mo.group('linesep')
break
# We saw an inter-part boundary. Were we in the preamble?
if capturing_preamble:
if preamble:
# According to RFC 2046, the last newline belongs
# to the boundary.
lastline = preamble[-1]
eolmo = NLCRE_eol.search(lastline)
if eolmo:
preamble[-1] = lastline[:-len(eolmo.group(0))]
self._cur.preamble = EMPTYSTRING.join(preamble)
capturing_preamble = False
self._input.unreadline(line)
continue
# We saw a boundary separating two parts. Consume any
# multiple boundary lines that may be following. Our
# interpretation of RFC 2046 BNF grammar does not produce
# body parts within such double boundaries.
while True:
line = self._input.readline()
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
mo = boundaryre.match(line)
if not mo:
self._input.unreadline(line)
break
# Recurse to parse this subpart; the input stream points
# at the subpart's first line.
self._input.push_eof_matcher(boundaryre.match)
for retval in self._parsegen():
if retval is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
break
# Because of RFC 2046, the newline preceding the boundary
# separator actually belongs to the boundary, not the
# previous subpart's payload (or epilogue if the previous
# part is a multipart).
if self._last.get_content_maintype() == 'multipart':
epilogue = self._last.epilogue
if epilogue == '':
self._last.epilogue = None
elif epilogue is not None:
mo = NLCRE_eol.search(epilogue)
if mo:
end = len(mo.group(0))
self._last.epilogue = epilogue[:-end]
else:
payload = self._last._payload
if isinstance(payload, str):
mo = NLCRE_eol.search(payload)
if mo:
payload = payload[:-len(mo.group(0))]
self._last._payload = payload
self._input.pop_eof_matcher()
self._pop_message()
# Set the multipart up for newline cleansing, which will
# happen if we're in a nested multipart.
self._last = self._cur
else:
# I think we must be in the preamble
assert capturing_preamble
preamble.append(line)
# We've seen either the EOF or the end boundary. If we're still
# capturing the preamble, we never saw the start boundary. Note
# that as a defect and store the captured text as the payload.
if capturing_preamble:
defect = errors.StartBoundaryNotFoundDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
self._cur.set_payload(EMPTYSTRING.join(preamble))
epilogue = []
for line in self._input:
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
self._cur.epilogue = EMPTYSTRING.join(epilogue)
return
# If we're not processing the preamble, then we might have seen
# EOF without seeing that end boundary...that is also a defect.
if not close_boundary_seen:
defect = errors.CloseBoundaryNotFoundDefect()
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
return
# Everything from here to the EOF is epilogue. If the end boundary
# ended in a newline, we'll need to make sure the epilogue isn't
# None
if linesep:
epilogue = ['']
else:
epilogue = []
for line in self._input:
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
epilogue.append(line)
# Any CRLF at the front of the epilogue is not technically part of
# the epilogue. Also, watch out for an empty string epilogue,
# which means a single newline.
if epilogue:
firstline = epilogue[0]
bolmo = NLCRE_bol.match(firstline)
if bolmo:
epilogue[0] = firstline[len(bolmo.group(0)):]
self._cur.epilogue = EMPTYSTRING.join(epilogue)
return
# Otherwise, it's some non-multipart type, so the entire rest of the
# file contents becomes the payload.
lines = []
for line in self._input:
if line is NeedMoreData:
yield NeedMoreData
continue
lines.append(line)
self._cur.set_payload(EMPTYSTRING.join(lines))
def _parse_headers(self, lines):
# Passed a list of lines that make up the headers for the current msg
lastheader = ''
lastvalue = []
for lineno, line in enumerate(lines):
# Check for continuation
if line[0] in ' \t':
if not lastheader:
# The first line of the headers was a continuation. This
# is illegal, so let's note the defect, store the illegal
# line, and ignore it for purposes of headers.
defect = errors.FirstHeaderLineIsContinuationDefect(line)
self.policy.handle_defect(self._cur, defect)
continue
lastvalue.append(line)
continue
if lastheader:
self._cur.set_raw(*self.policy.header_source_parse(lastvalue))
lastheader, lastvalue = '', []
# Check for envelope header, i.e. unix-from
if line.startswith('From '):
if lineno == 0:
# Strip off the trailing newline
mo = NLCRE_eol.search(line)
if mo:
line = line[:-len(mo.group(0))]
self._cur.set_unixfrom(line)
continue
elif lineno == len(lines) - 1:
# Something looking like a unix-from at the end - it's
# probably the first line of the body, so push back the
# line and stop.
self._input.unreadline(line)
return
else:
# Weirdly placed unix-from line. Note this as a defect
# and ignore it.
defect = errors.MisplacedEnvelopeHeaderDefect(line)
self._cur.defects.append(defect)
continue
# Split the line on the colon separating field name from value.
# There will always be a colon, because if there wasn't the part of
# the parser that calls us would have started parsing the body.
i = line.find(':')
# If the colon is on the start of the line the header is clearly
# malformed, but we might be able to salvage the rest of the
# message. Track the error but keep going.
if i == 0:
defect = errors.InvalidHeaderDefect("Missing header name.")
self._cur.defects.append(defect)
continue
assert i>0, "_parse_headers fed line with no : and no leading WS"
lastheader = line[:i]
lastvalue = [line]
# Done with all the lines, so handle the last header.
if lastheader:
self._cur.set_raw(*self.policy.header_source_parse(lastvalue))
class BytesFeedParser(FeedParser):
"""Like FeedParser, but feed accepts bytes."""
def feed(self, data):
super().feed(data.decode('ascii', 'surrogateescape'))
Rosenblum TV: Video training, virtual workshops, classes, tutorials
RE-INVENTING THE TELEVISION NEWS BUSINESS*
A revolution in video storytelling
Creating entirely new & cost-effective production methods
From the world leaders in video production training and the creators of Character Driven Storytelling™
*and every other business that uses video
WHAT WE DO
Over the past 35 years, we have designed, built or restructured some of the most powerful news and journalism companies in the world.
We replace the traditional TV news ‘crew’ with one highly trained journalist, working alone with nothing but an iPhone.
No more TV news ‘crews’, no editors and no field producers.
This is television news done the way newspaper journalism is done – one reporter with their electronic pad and pencil.
In doing this, we can cut the cost of production by as much as 75% while increasing ratings and audience engagement.
In the place of conventional TV news ‘packages’ – ie, reporter stand up, interview, b-roll, man on the street, we marry great journalism with Netflix and Hollywood storytelling.
It’s a combination that works.
We have taken most of our clients to #1 in their respective markets.
And it’s not just for news. Any company, any profit, any NGO and anyone else who is online needs to tell their story in compelling yet cost-effective video. We can teach you to do that. Either in person or virtually.
EXAMPLES OF WHAT WE CAN TEACH YOUR STAFF TO PRODUCE
ITAY HOD
Itay Hod, MMJ with KPIX/CBS in San Francisco, took the 5-Day Intensive Video Storytelling Bootcamp in 2018.
Because he works alone, with only an iPhone, he was able to embed himself with a homeless family.
Here’s the story he produced in a one-day turn.
KIET DO
Kiet Do, an MMJ with KPIX/CBS in San Francisco, took the 5-Day Intensive Video Storytelling Bootcamp in 2021.
Here is a story he produced, all on his own, with only an iPhone and in a one-day turn.
TAYLOR SCHAUB
Taylor Schaub, an MMJ with Spectrum News 1 in LA, took the 5-Day Intensive Video Storytelling Bootcamp in 2023.
Here is a story he turned in only one day, using only an iPhone. It was the first video story he ever did and it was nominated for an Emmy.
THE BOOTCAMP
How do we convert stations and whole networks to working in this way?
Since 1988, we have run intensive 5-Day Video Storytelling Bootcamps
We have done these all over the world.
These are hands-on bootcamps, and participants learn an entirely new way of creating TV news stories.
-We shoot at a 3:1 ratio or lower, so turnaround times are fast.
-We go directly from camera to timelilne and edit – no written scripts. We work in the medium of pictures and sound.
-We are entirely character-driven.
-We are driven by pictures and real events.
-We are focused almost entirely on ’the viewer experience’.
Since 1988, more than 70,000 journalists around the world have taken our bootcamps, either in person on virtualy.
We have started to work with CBS News, bringing our ideas of character-driven storytelling to one of the most successful and biggest networks in the United States. Since beginning to work with them ratings have climbed and more importantly, audience engagement is through the ceiling.
We started New York Times Television in 1990 and it was the first paper to be brought into the world of TV. It quickly became one of the most successful non-fiction production companies in the United States. The series and documentaries we produced won many awards including multiple Emmys.
We have been working with the BBC since the year 2000 helping to convert their national news network to our visual storytelling technique. Most recently we have trained teams from their sports, documentaries, and comedy divisions to make character-driven stories using only smartphones.
For the past five years we have worked with Spectrum News to introduce and train their journalists on visual, character driven storytelling using smartphones helping to create a different kind of local news for their network of 24-Hour News Stations across the United States.
In 2006, we were approached by the United Nations. Rather than rely on news outlets, it would be much easier to train the field operatives to produce their own stories. We spent two years working with the UN, training more than 100 of their staff in bootcamps in Geneva and Nairobi.
We trained 50 print reporters at the paper to shoot and tell their own stories, in conjunction with their print work. We built a TV newsroom in their existing print newsroom – you could not ask for a better set and they began to live stream their stories in conjunction with their print work.
We spent two years with McGraw Hill, training more than 150 of their staffers, making them completely video literate. McGraw/Hill media properties we transit included Business Week, Aviation Week, (what was the name of the architecture magazine), and JD Power and Associates.
In 1990, we were approached by The Voice of America, the official broadcasting agency for the United States Government. When we met with VOA, they were only a short wave radio broadcaster, but working with them, we took them into television, launching VOA-TV.
British based Oyster Yachts makes some of the finest yachts in the world. Like every other company, they had to find a way to feed the never-ending video demands of social media – sites like Instagram and TikTok. We trained the Oyster staff to tell their own stories, using only iPhones.
We were approached by SEPA, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency because they had to continually find a way to ‘feed the media beast’. The result was that SEPA was able to tell their own stories, whenever they wanted, and at almost no additional cost.
Michael Rosenblum has been writing about the media since 1988. His work and ideas have appeared in The Guardian, The Huffington Post, Ilkeston Life and many other publications.
He has been blogging regularly for the past 35 years on this subject. Having taught media studies at Columbia University, NYU and now the University of Oxford, he is considered an expert on this subject.
Continue reading this post or look back at previous posts.
