Blog

Au Revoir Encyclopedia Britannica – And Why NBC Is Next To Go

By Michael Rosenblum | Published March 14th, 2012

 

When I was a kid you either had The Encyclopedia Britannica or World Book.

The rich kids had Britannica. The upward strivers had World Book.

We had World Book.

Britannica was a status symbol, but it was more than that. It was the source of all knowledge and a place to copy homework papers from.

Yesterday, Britannica announced that they were going out of business – or at least the print version was.

After 244 years, the Encyclopedia Britannica has sold its last edition – and at $1500 for each edition, it’s no wonder.

Britannica was yet another victim of the Internet – in this case, Wikipedia, which is free. It’s also better, as it is updated in real time, as opposed to every few years.
Britannica has about 100,000 articles; Wikipedia has 3.7 million.  Wikipedia has a theoretical valuation of $5 Billion.  Britannica is.. well, nowhere near that.

The irony is that The Encyclopedia Britannica COULD have become Wikipedia. They were there, in the business of providing instant in-depth information on lots of topics before Jimmy Wales even thought of Wikipedia. Britannica OWNED the space.  They just never did anything.

It’s not like they didn’t know.

Here’s an entry on The Internet from the 1977 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica:

Two paragraphs.

Two paragraphs buried in thousands and thousands of pages of content.

Yet they would prove to be the death knell of the entire 244 year old industry.

Ironic, no?

Now, why did a big (and clearly very smart) company like Encyclopedia Britannica (you can’t get much smarter than that) miss the boat that led to their demise?

I look out my window and I see another Encyclopedia Britannica
This is the NBC Building in Rockefeller Center
30 Rock
It’s a massive pile of bricks
Massive!
And it isn’t wrapped in authentic Moroccan Leather, but it’s another Encyclopedia Britannica waiting to happen.
It’s only a matter of time.

Al Jazeera Airs Syrian Doc Shot Entirely on iPhone

By Michael Rosenblum | Published March 13th, 2012

Tomorrow night, (March 14th), Al Jazeera is going to air a documentary shot entirely on an iPhone by a journalist working in Syria.

Syria is a very dangerous place to work and the iPhone gave him access to film without being noticed.

It also speaks volumes about the potential of iPhone (and iPads) for serious video journalism that is fast, simple and allows incredible access.

This, direct from the Al Jazeera press release:

“In this episode of People & Power, an undercover Al Jazeera correspondent takes us inside the lives of Syria’s anti-government demonstrators.

During his two-month journey through the Syrian uprising, he meets resistance fighters, protesters, Syrian army deserters, footballers-turned-revolutionaries and cigarette smugglers who have joined the fight – ordinary Syrians showing extraordinary courage. He stays in their homes and on their streets.

And with Al Jazeera cameras banned inside Syria, he must use only his mobile phone to document their lives, their anger and their fears.”

As we have said many times in the past, the trick here is not to use this new technology as a cheap and simple substitute for conventional betacams and crews.  this is something completely new.  iPhone video cameras, when used properly, can be to video and television journalism what Leica stills cameras were to photography and photo journalism. They allowed incredible intimacy and access and produced a powerful personal product.

What Cartier Bresson and W. Eugene Smith did for LIFE Magazine and Magnum in the 1930s and 1940s, now, I think,  properly employed, iPhones and their like can do for video journalism and the web, as well as television – as Al Jazeera clearly shows.

*and many thanks to @zabriskiepnt for a head’s up on this.

iPad3 – Is This The Definitive MMJ Tool?

By Michael Rosenblum | Published March 8th, 2012

iPad HD or iPad3 or whatever they want to call it….

Two nights ago, we had Melissa Flemming, from the UN over to dinner.

We have been talking to her about training and empowering her staff to create their own videos and tell their own stories online.

Of course, it makes sense.  It makes sense for the UN. It makes sense for anyone, in fact.

The question becomes: What kind of equipment do they need?  In fact, what is the optimal equipment package for any MMJ.

MMJ – I hate this term, but it’s out there. Multi Media Journalist – that is, a journalist who is expected to produce video, stills and text for a website.

We were recently working with a major broadcaster in the UK, teaching their staff to be VJs.  They did a great job. Then, one of their VJs came to visit us in NY with her equipment. She had on a backpack that could have been used for a lunar landing.  ”What’s in the packpack”?  Camera, batteries, charger, cables, laptop, charger, cables, digital camera”.  Well, it certainly is all that you need, but by the time you have all this crap strapped to your back, do you really want to do anything?

Then, I saw the iPad3, which they are not calling it. They are calling it iPad New… or something like that.

In any event, this looks like a real game changer for field production for the web.

Then, to add to this, Ian Wagdin, The BBC’s super tech guy at their new digital facility in Manchester showed me his neat use your fingers to move stuff editing software on his iPad.  Cool.

I have not gotten my hands on an iPad3 yet.. gimme a few days, but I have read about it to see that it could be the Holy Grail of digital journalism.

HD video camera
1080 P video
Apparently enough memory to shoot 2 hours of video (yet to be confirmed)
HD stills camera
iPhoto
HD video editing software with touchscreen (!).
Text and word processing
Instand upload ability from source
Nice graphics package

Looks good, no?

One tool does all. I mean, what else do you really need? And it’s all self-contained.

Of course, shooting with an iPad may prove to be a bit weird, or something to get used to – I will let you know.. but it’s really interesting.

Maybe we can replace that giant backpack with one iPad (in a cool sleeve or something).

Could be a real game-changer.

Stand by…

The Case for Video Literacy

By Michael Rosenblum | Published March 7th, 2012
teaching video literacy at the Guardian

Teaching video literacy at the Guardian. “We are, today, a society that is defined by video,” says Michael Rosenblum.

Last week we trained 18 people to shoot, edit and produce video at theGuardian Media Academy. In that same week, another 254 people joined www.nyvs.com, our online video training site.

That’s not a lot when you consider the magnitude of what we are trying to accomplish. This is not about teaching people to make video. This is a revolution in literacy – video literacy.

We are, today, a society that is defined by video. It is, for better or for worse, the lingua franca of our culture. The average American or European spends five hours a day watching videos, either on TV or online. That number is primed to get much bigger as video migrates to the web.

Video is the way that we, increasingly, communicate stories, news, information and even ideas to one another. It’s powerful because it often transcends barriers of language and of culture. It is universal and powerful. It drives everything from politics to religion, and much in between.

Yet the vast majority of the population (on the order of 99.99%) is and remains largely video illiterate. That is, while they can watch video, they cannot create it. It means they’re cut off from participating in creating the very elements of our public discourse, as well as our entertainment. They are, in effect, second-class citizens.

What’s worse is that we are all the poorer as a culture when we place this incredibly powerful medium in the hands of a select (or self-selected) few. It’s a crazy and terribly destructive thing to do.

So no, we are not teaching people a skill; we are teaching them to participate in the formation of our culture, instead of being simply passive observers. There’s an old printing press in the main hall of the Guardian’s offices at Kings Place. It’s an interesting choice of decoration.

The morning after the printing press was invented in 1452, there was almost no one in Europe who was literate. Literacy was then the purview of a tiny and elite fraction of the population. The great and vast majority of the world was incapable of reading and writing.

So while the printing press was a wonderful machine for democratising learning and ideas, it had to go hand and hand with a rather rapid process of teaching people to read and write, and empowering them with the idea that they could do this, that it was, in fact, both their right and responsibility.

This transformation took several hundred years, and not an insignificant amount of blood was shed in its defence.

Today, we live in a world where print literacy – the ability to read and write – is viewed as a fundamental unifying principle of our culture. We teach people to write in school, not in the hope they might one day earn a living as writers, but so they might fully contribute to culture as a whole.

Now, as we move rapidly from a print-based to culture to a video-based culture, it’s equally important that we teach people how to communicate their ideas in video. Not so that they might one day earn a living as cameramen (though they might), but so that they might craft their ideas in the medium in which we are all increasingly communicating.

Michael Rosenblum is CEO at Rosenblum TV. See a video showcase form his recent four-day intensive video training bootcamp here – follow him on Twitter @Rosenblumtv

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To get more articles like this direct to your inbox, sign up free to become a member of the Guardian Media Network.