<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simpler and Simpler, Dumber and Dumber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189</link>
	<description>The digital video revolution starts here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:37:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can wisdom come in 140 characters or less? Ask Solomon &#124; Think Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189&#038;cpage=1#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Can wisdom come in 140 characters or less? Ask Solomon &#124; Think Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>[...] shorter messages are dumber messages. Twitter constrains messages to a mere 140 characters, and critics say it just puts another dent in our insect-like attention spans, and our ability to think and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shorter messages are dumber messages. Twitter constrains messages to a mere 140 characters, and critics say it just puts another dent in our insect-like attention spans, and our ability to think and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189&#038;cpage=1#comment-4296</link>
		<dc:creator>invitedmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189#comment-4296</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t be too tough on the young lad... he evidently knows the value of $$$!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t be too tough on the young lad&#8230; he evidently knows the value of $$$!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McNulty</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189&#038;cpage=1#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>A few months ago the Guardian published 8 questions from the new GSCE science paper. I tried them out on a dozen different people of different ages, educational attainment etc. The results: a nine-year-old did better than a 25 year old with good science GCSEs (from the late 90s). Apart from that, it was impossible to tell the difference between those who had science qualifications and those who had not, with two notable exceptions: in a sample which included nine-year-olds and eighty-year-olds with no GCSEs in anything at all, the two qualified scientists who had been schooled in the 60s and graduated in the 70s came bottom of the class.

It would be funny if it wasn&#039;t that many of those who left school in the 80s and 90s are now running the show. And those who are leaving school now will soon be taking their place.

Try it out for yourself. It&#039;s online and interactive at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/quiz/2009/mar/27/gcse-science-quiz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago the Guardian published 8 questions from the new GSCE science paper. I tried them out on a dozen different people of different ages, educational attainment etc. The results: a nine-year-old did better than a 25 year old with good science GCSEs (from the late 90s). Apart from that, it was impossible to tell the difference between those who had science qualifications and those who had not, with two notable exceptions: in a sample which included nine-year-olds and eighty-year-olds with no GCSEs in anything at all, the two qualified scientists who had been schooled in the 60s and graduated in the 70s came bottom of the class.</p>
<p>It would be funny if it wasn&#8217;t that many of those who left school in the 80s and 90s are now running the show. And those who are leaving school now will soon be taking their place.</p>
<p>Try it out for yourself. It&#8217;s online and interactive at <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/quiz/2009/mar/27/gcse-science-quiz" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/quiz/2009/mar/27/gcse-science-quiz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189&#038;cpage=1#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3189#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>Who are you and what have you done with the real Michael Rosenblum?

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you and what have you done with the real Michael Rosenblum?</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
