The Rosenblum TV blog archives.

South Africa Heads Toward Zimbabweland

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 12th, 2010

All hail the Glorious Leader!

How soon things change.

The World Cup from South Africa was supposed to consecrate a new era for South Africa in the world.

Modern.

Sophisticated.

Advanced.

Now, President Zuma has made a clear demonstration that he intends to take his country down the path of their neighbor Zimbabwe, towards a dictatorship and repression.

Too bad.

Poor South Africa has been through more than enough torture since the first Dutch settlers landed there more than 400 years ago.

And, one might have hoped, that the legacy of Nelson Mandella would become the guiding spirit for the country.

Instead, it seems, Josef Stalin and Robert Mugabe are to be the guiding spirits of the country.

As, alas, with most of the rest of the continent, South Africa is now headed toward becoming yet another petty dictatorship.

Yesterday, President Zuma announced that “media need to be regulated, effectively ending any notion of a free press in South Afirca.

Said Zuma:

“The media that says this is a restriction on us, we are the watchdog of the people – they were never elected.

“They need to be governed themselves because at times they go overboard on the rights,” he said.

Asked who would have the capability of regulating a free press, Zuma responded:

“We at the ANC, we believe we do. We fought for the rights. We understand what are the rights.

Well, there you have it in a nutshell.

The ANC understands what are the rights.

The press does not.

For Zuma and the ANC is this not just rhetoric. They are preparing a bill that they are going to jam past their rubber-stamp pariament later this year to enforce this dictatorship by law.

If you were concerned enough about South Africa to protest apartheid, then you must be as concerned about South Africa to protest this affront to basic freedom and human rights.

I am indebted to Jonathan Berman and our friends at 790TV in Capetown for bringing this to our attention.


Elisabeth Kubler-Ross and the Newsroom

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 11th, 2010

Elisabeth Kubler-Ross

We spent the past few months, off and on, having a series of protracted meetings, demonstrations and conversations with a major US network news organization.

Which one does not matter, because in truth, they’re all in about the same place.

The relationship began when I wrote to the President of the network and suggested that it might be a good idea to talk.

He agreed, and that led to a series of meetings over there.

They told us that they were already well advanced in training their own people.

They had, in fact been doing this for two years already.

And how many VJs had their trained and fielded so far?

5.

But not all of them were doing it full time.

Fine.

We took them through the paces, took them to bootcamps we were running for other news operations, on and on and on.

They nodded and said they were impressed.

In the end, they said they admired all they saw, but they were going to do this ‘internally’.

Well, good luck and God speed.

A few years ago, I had a meeting with Les Moonves at CBS News.

He asked what I would do with their news operation.

I told him.

He said, ‘I understand this, but to do that would be to restructure the entire news organization’.

‘Yes it would’, I said.

‘I am not prepared to do that’, he responded.

‘You’re going to do it, now or later. But eventually you’re going to do it’.

The people who run the networks already know what has to be done.

The people just below them just can’t bring themselves to do it.

They keep hoping something will change. Somehow, through some miracle, things will get back to ‘the old days’.

The old days are dead.

And soon, so too will the network news operations be dead.

Just like the newspapers.

It’s hard for them to deal with all of this, but now, having done this for more than twenty years, I can see that there are stages that they have to pass through.

The first one is denial.

That’s one we are all familiar with.

Then comes anger.

Just go read the comments on B-roll.net.

After anger comes bargaining.

This is where we are with the latest round with the major network:

‘OK. We’ll train a few in house, just to be on the safe side.. OK? Satisfied?’

Next we’ll soon see depression at the TV news networks. You already see it at the newspapers.

The Washington Post? The LA Times? Even the once mighty NY Times? Anyone want to buy stock in any of those papers?

Anyone want to take a survey in the newsrooms?

Finally, we will come to acceptance.

But by that time, it is going to be too little, too late.

In 1969, Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross introduced the idea of the Five Stages of Grief in her book On Death and Dying.

As the news business dies, we can see that she knew far more than she realized.

The stages, it seems, are applicable to industries as well as people.

How Do You Know We’re Living In The Roman Empire?

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 10th, 2010

The idiot in chief…

One of the most influential books I ever read was Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman.

Published in 1984, it was seminal in shaping my thinking about the impact of television on our culture.

Fittingly subtitled “Public Discourse In The Age of Showbusiness”, Postman predicted that as television become more and more powerful and began to convey not just entertainment, but politics and religion to us as well; that those disciplines would have to become as entertaining as television sitcoms or they would lose their audiences.

How right he was.

Now we have a culture that spends 4.5 hours a day watching TV, and 8.5 hours a day staring at screens.

We have not only lost the ability to differentiate between reality and fiction, we no longer even care.

People Magazine this week announced that Levi Johnston, the on again, off again paramour of the daughter of Sarah Palin, yet another product of the ‘reality’ entertainment culture – a woman who resigned her position as elected Governor of Alaska to host her own reality show on LC – (take a deep breath here because this stuff is complicated)… Oh yeah… Levi Johnston is now running for Mayor of Wasilla, the place where is on again, off again mother in law sort of got her start.

What makes this particularly interesting, besides the fact that Levi has the IQ of a tomato, is that he is not only running for real, but doing it as part of a pitch for a new reality show: Loving Levi: The Road To The Mayor’s Office.

And why not?

Did we not just have Michaele and Tariq Sahali arrested for crashing a White House Dinner only to find that Michaele was in fact cast as part of the Real Housewives of DC?

Politics and ‘reality’ now are totally indistinguishable. And does it matter anyway?  All television is entertainment, and if its not entertaining, no one wants to know anyway.

Look at the Moon Landings.

We landed a man on the moon in 1969, probably one of the greatest achievements in human history.

The last time a man walked on the moon was 1972, 38 years ago.

No one has gone back to the moon in 38 years!

And why is that?

We certainly have the technology to do it.  That technology is as old as my father’s Buick Futura.

What we lack is the will.

We will gladly spend billions to make and then to see Avatar, a movie about space travel – in 3D!

What we won’t do is spend a penny to do it for real.

And why do we love Avatar and hate NASA?

It’s because Moon Landings are BORING!

They are boring.

They make bad TV.

Who wants to watch some guy jump around on the lunar surface (in black and white no less!), when we can travel to planets yet undiscovered at the speed of light. Whether it is real or not is, to us, immaterial. So long as it’s exciting.

Which brings us back to Levi Johnston and his Reality Run for Mayor of Wasilla.

Whether he is qualified or not is immaterial.

Was Sarah Palin qualified?

Was George W. Bush qualified?

We don’t rate qualified very high, so long as it’s entertaining.


The McCormick Reaper and The Death of Journalism

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 9th, 2010

When the term Broadcasting meant something else entirely

Even though I am sitting on an ‘out island’ in the Bahamas this August, it does not mean I am not working!

This morning, I spent an hour on the phone with a young woman named Mary Thorsby.  She works for the very prolific Ken Kobre, whose blog I think is one of the best things in the Videojournalism world.  You can read it here.

Ken is writing a book about the videojournalism revolution and Ms Thorsby called me this morning to pick my brains about the prospects of earning a living as a VJ.  I probably didn’t give her the answers she was looking for.

The future is, to my mind, in the V part, but not so much in the J part. That is, I think there is a very bright,almost limitless future for video and those who can make video in a world of web, iPhones, iPads and video screens everywhere, even in elevators!

Where I don’t think there is much of a future is in journalism.

This is not because journalism doesn’t have a future. I think that does as well, and it is equally bright. But the idea of grabbing a video camera, heading off to Iraq and selling your work probably does not have much of a future.  It doesn’t have much of a future because the very technology that allows you to do that also allows anyone else to do it, and so the market for content has been flooded.

This is no bad thing.

But it does make for a different world.

When I was in my early 20s, I ran off to Gaza with a video camera and sold two pieces to PBS for $50,000.  Those days are over. But in those days, an 8 minute video report from Gaza was well worth $25,000.  Who went to Gaza with a video camera except big networks, and they produced in a way that was totally cost inefficient. But they were all that there was.

Today, there are probably 500,000 people in Gaza with video cameras, and more and more of them are getting their stuff on Youtube or elsewhere.  Add to that the number of 22 year olds running around the world with video cameras and you would be hard pressed to find someone to pay you $5,000 let along $50,000 for two 8-minute pieces.

All of this brings me to The McCormick Reaper.

The Reaper was a mechanical way of harvesting grain.

Invented in 1831 and patented in 1834, it made its inventor fabulously rich.

It also shattered the British agricultural industry. American grain production increased a breathtaking 700 percent in a deade.  As the price of American grain went down, food became cheaper for everyone, even in the UK where it was imported. But farmers in England were effectively driven out of business.  The high prices they were used to getting for grain could no longer hold. The imports killed them and the big Ameican farms were perfect for the era of mechanized farming that was at hand.

Like the McCormick Reaper, small video cameras in every cell phone have made what was once an expensive rarity a commodity.

There is so much video flooding the marketplace now (24 hours to Youtube every minute) that no one is going long pay, or pay very much for yet another story from Gaza.

That is not where the future lays.

It does lay in aggregating, editing, and publishing the best of this tidal wave of material.

The McCormick Reaper didn’t mean the ‘end of Agriculture’. It did mean the end of expensive, inefficient farmers.

Same goes for the future of video and journalism.

There’s a future there for video, but it’s probably not running off to Iraq to ‘make your documentary’.

The Library of Youtube

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 5th, 2010

Yeah…lemme see American Idol from last week….

In 1988 I left my  job as a producer at CBS News to go to Gaza with a small video camera and start shooting my own stories.

I spent a month in Gaza living in the Jabalya Refugee Camp and shot two piece that I sold to the MacNeil Lehrer Newshour for $50,000;00

MacNeil/Lehrer was happy to pay $50,000 for the two pieces because it was less than they would have paid if they had sent a producer and crew on their own.

Those days are over.

No one these days is going to get $50K for a couple of video stories.

That’s because everyone and their brother has a video camera today, including half the people in Gaza.

The perceived value of a video report has collapsed as the market has been flooded with content from millions of people with millions of video cameras around the world.  Video from Gaza, or indeed going there with a video camera is no longer a rarity, and no longer worth paying for. Or at least not 50k worth.

What we are watching is a veritable explosion of video content worldwide.  People now upload 24 hours of video to Youtube every minute.

Many years ago, (many), I went across 57th Street from the CBS Broadcast Center to the CBS tape library.

The tape library was a mess.

One of the first places Larry Tische decided to cut back on costs was on the library staff. So it was just a giant warehouse filled with boes and boxes of umatic tape, much of it unmarked all of it uncatalogued.

My first business partner, Jan Stenbeck, the Swedish billionaire and genius, upon hearing of the conditions in the CBS library, offered Tische an interesting deal: he would clean up and manage the library for free if he could take 50% of the lease rights to everything in the library.

Tische turned him down. That was probably a mistake.

Stenbeck could see the value of a video library in a world in which there were going to be 500+ cable channels.

The demand for video content has now far transcended what Stenbeck saw for 500 channels.

Now, between 1200 cable channels, satellite, iPads, iPods and the web, the demand for video content is far greater.

And so the value of the libraries of video that we are building all the time is even moreso.

But libraries, as Stenbeck understood, have to be organized and managed,

In ancient Rome, manuscripts were rare and valuable. In Alexandria, in northern Egypt, the Library of Alexandria was the greatest reposotiry of written books and documents in the world.

Our Library of Alexandria today is online – in places like Youtube.

And we are only 3 or 4 years into The Library of Youtube.

But it is vastly mineable for content – if we can organize it.

Want to make a documentary about America’s involvement in Iraq? The material is all already here – between Youtube and what is in the NBC or CBS libraries – wherever they are.

Want to make a history of America’s Hip Hop music. Youtube + MTV.

Want to do a sports series? Youtube + ESPN.

There is no reason that The History Channel has to be The Hitler Channel.

There is so much more – and it is of so much value, most of which is completely untouched.

All it takes is a little organization and there is a real business there.

As Stenbeck understood.

But then again, he wasn’t a billionaire for nothing.

Ted Turner and Me, Part II

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 4th, 2010

Pat Mitchell, Dr. Denis Mukwege, Elizabeth Dewberry, Ted Turner

OK

By popular demand, the continuation of the Ted Turner story.

So at the end of the meeting in New York, Ted turned to me and said, ‘You go down to Atlanta and see Pat Mitchell’,

and then smacked me a few times.

Needless to say, I thought I was ‘in’.

To get CNN as a client would be a massive coup. And Turner had bought into it.

So I got on the first flight to Atlanta the next morning and grabbed a cab over to CNN headquarters.

Mitchell ran CNN’s operation, so she had a big office.

In fact, it was two offices, outer and inner.

She met me in the outer office and she was all smiles and sunshine. Then she invited me into her inner office.

Great!, I thought, I could deal with Atlanta….

As soon as she closed to the door however she spun around.  There were like lightning bolts coming out of where her eyes once were.

“How did you get to him?” she demanded.

“I… I… um….” (well, I was a bit taken aback.

She repeated the question. This time more slowly.

“How did you get to him”?

“I wrote him a letter”.

She took a moment to digest this important piece of information.

OK. I wasn’t particularly connected to anyone. I hadn’t been introduced by another billionaire or a board member of someone important.

I was just what I appeared to be…

unimportant.

She seemed to relax a bit. She was back in control.

“Well”, she said, “I know all about what you’re doing, and we’re not doing it at CNN”.

“You’re not?” I asked.

“No”, she said.  “We’re beta”.

In those days we were still doing VJs with Hi8.

“Beta Beta Beta”.

I could have been in a chapter of Brave New World.

“Beta”. “Have you seen our facility here?”

She arranged for me to have a tour.

Great.

When I got back to NY, I called Turner.

“Well, I can’t maker her do what she don’t want to do” he said, and wished me good luck.

And that… was that.
Which was too bad.

CNN would have been an interesting target for the VJ model. Perfect in fact.

But as Ted Turner said, ‘you can’t make a person do what they don’t want to do’.

Fortunately (for me) The BBC felt otherwise.

Now, of course, CNN is dipping their toe in the whole VJ thing, both with having a few of their reporters shoot and cut their own stuff, and of course, iReport.

There’s even a piece here on the CNN site explaining how iReporters can use the new iPhone and iMovie functions.

Well, better late than never.

But it’s pretty remarkable to me that CNN, which was once so much on the cutting edge of news and new technology is today more then 8-track of video journalism.

Too bad.

Ted Turner and Me

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 3rd, 2010

You want your ten minutes?

Most people spend their lives thinking about or talking about what they are going to do, but few actually do anything.

This is because no one ever taught them what to do.

When we go to school, we are not taught how to take an action on our own.  Rather, school teaches us to obey the rules.  Public education in the United States was a function of the introduction of the factory system.  Like so much of our world, it was also a function of the Industrial Revolution.

The new factories needed workers. And Factory work had a few requirements – show up on time, do what you are told, take lunch break, go back to work. Go home.

Prior to the Industrial Revolution, both in Britain and in the US, most people were agrarian. Their rhythms of work and life were dictated by nature and by the seasons. This did not go well with factory work. So their children had to be educated to be good factory workers.

Public schools were the perfect answer.  Arrive on time or get a demerit.  Change classes at the bells.  Break for lunch.  Back to the bell-driven system.  And you got an A if you did exactly as you were told to do. Manufacture the multiplication tables. Manufacture the history of America.  Make me a spelling list.

When you graduated you were ready for factory work. What you were not ready for was to take control of your own life. You were ready to obey. Not to innovate.

So innovative behaviour does not come naturally to most people because no one ever told them how to do it.

Like anything else, it isn’t so hard once you know what to do.

The first rule is be bold. Don’t be afraid. And above all, don’t be afraid to take a risk and fail.  Failure is the greatest teacher in the world.  In fact, I think it is fair to say that nothing succeeds like failure.

There is nothing worse than someone who has never failed because it means that they have never pushed themselves beyond their comfort zone.  Failing is pushing against the edge. Fail, learn and go back again.

We have an inherent fear of failure, another by-product of the factory educational system.  We are taught from the very first grade to fear failure.  We always want an A. We always want to complete the task exactly as we were told to do it.

This is great if you are assembling flanges or Ford Broncos, but it is really bad if you are trying something new.  Our fear of failure makes us risk averse.

Inherent in our DNA is the deep seated belief that there is still that Great Nun In The Sky who is going to come out of nowhere and smack our hands with a ruler for stepping outside the boundaries of accepted behavour. This also cripples us and makes us fearful of taking a risk.

Here’s the good news: There is no Great Nun In The Sky.

In fact, if you try something and fail, no one really cares. So go ahead. Try.

Many years ago, I thought I had a pretty good idea on how  to run a TV newsroom much more cost effectively. But who was I? I had not spent years in TV newsrooms. I just had an idea.

So I wrote a letter to Ted Turner, who was then running CNN.

I didn’t know him and he sure as heck had never heard of me. I was no one.

But I wrote anyway.

It was a short letter, only three paragraphs. But I got to the point right away.  I said,  ‘you make television all wrong’.  I said, ‘I know a better way to do this’. Then I said, ‘you give me 10 minutes, and I will give you the world – or whatever part of it you don’t own already.’

Then I mailed the letter.

Who knows?

Three days later my phone rang.

It was Ted Turner.

“You want your 10 minutes, you got ‘em. You be in my office tomorrow morning at 9 am”. Then he hung up the phone.

The next morning I was in his office at 9 am.

And there he was.

He looked at me and he looked at his watch.

“Go” he said.

“You make television all wrong”, I said. “You do it in a crazy and expensive way.  Every one of your reporters should carry a small video camera and shoot all their own stuff.”

He was looking at his watch.

Then he looked up.

“You’re right”, he said. “I know…”

“I know how to cut your staffing and increase your coverage of the world all at the same time…”

“Stop!” he said.

I thought my time was up.

Then he turned to his assistant.

“Get me Pat Mitchell”.

Pat Mitchell ran CNN in Atlanta.

The assistant came back in.  “She says she’s in a meeting”.

Turner went nuts.

Screaming.

“You tell her she works for me, God damn it”…

In an instant Pat Mitchell was on the phone.

“Yes?????”

“I got this Michael Rosenblum here in my office” he said.

“He got this idea on how to make TV news with those little home video cameras”….

He hung up the phone and turned to me.

“You get on a plane now and you go down to Atlanta and see Pat Mitchell and you tell her I sent you”.

Then he came over to me. He’s a big guy.

Then he smacked me on the shoulder.

Pow!

“You a smart Jew”, he said.

“You gonna make me a pile of money”.

And that was how I met Ted Turner….and Pat Mitchell.

Lessons From The Industrial Revolution

By Michael Rosenblum | Published August 2nd, 2010

It was the Google of its day…

Yesterday, the FT carried a very sobering article about the end of the Middle Class in America.

It profiled several formerly Middle Class working families, all of whom are seeing both their jobs and their way of life disappearing.

It is not coming back.

The economy of the country and the world has changed. However, that change represents great opportunity.

The last time such a massive transformation happened was probably the Industrial Revolution.

Then, Britain, a small island with very limited resources was able to become the most powerful and robust economy in the world. So powerful that they would grow to dominate the planet for nearly 300 years.  At their peak, this small Island with less than 2% of the world’s population would represent nearly 25% of the world’s wealth and rule a quarter of the planet.

How did they do that?

The British were the first to embrace the Industrial Revolution. And they did it with a vengeance.

But the Industrial Revolution was also a massively dislocating event.  Stockings, for example, used to be knitted by hand. It took nearly a week to make one pair of stockings. They were very expensive, and the skills to do them took years. The people who were stocking knitters made a nice living based on their craftsmanship.  Most of them were concentrated around Nottingham, England.

When Richard Arkwright started building his water-looms for mechanized weaving, stockings were one of the first things he manufactured.  He could turn out a pair of stockings in a few minutes, and he could do them by the hundreds.

The stocking makers were suddenly unemployed.  Their centuries old craft, suddenly worthless.

Think of them as the journalists of the 18th Century.

What was once a high paying craft and skill which could earn them a good income was almost overnight worthless.

From the perspective of a stocking weaver, things looked very bad.  From the perspective of a newly middle class factory owner, things could not have looked better. And indeed, the British became weavers and cloth-makers for the world – and built an industrial and financial empire on that new technology.

Today, we all have pretty much all the cheap stockings and cloth that we need, and what we do need, we get from China and India, which also are starting to manufacture cars and Apple iPhones.

What we are in need of today is content. Lots of content.

1,000 cable channels, iPhone, iPads and computer screens that have to be filled. All the time.

Content is today’s stockings.

It used to be an expensive and complex and difficult craft.

It doesn’t have to be.

With your home video camera and your laptop you can create content for a much much lower cost than the craftsmen.

The combination of things like Final Cut Pro or HD iPhones or Youtube are the Arkwright’s Mills of the 21st Century.

The future now as the future then lay in cheap mass production – high volume, low cost.

Because the appetite is certainly there.

In the 17th Century, one owned one pair of stockings for a lifetime, and kept them for a lifetime.

The idea that you would throw out a pair of socks because they have a small hole in the toe – or that you would walk into the Nike store and buy a dozen sports socks for the cost of a lunch would have been sheer insanity. Yet here it is.

The idea that a movie studio like Dreamworks produces perhaps a dozen films a year, or that cable channels rerun and repeat cable content ad infinitum will also one day be seen as sheer insanity.

The day is coming when it will be as cheap and simple to produce video content to fill all those screens as it is to produce socks.

And that is the great opportunity for the next level of the American economy.

But, as with the weavers in Nottingham, it will be painful to get there… for some.

Amusing Ourselves to Death*

By Michael Rosenblum | Published July 31st, 2010

ha ha ha… all very amusing…

When I was growing up there were two books that provided alternative views of what the future might look like.

One was 1984, by George Orwell, a totalitarian view of a world run by a crushing dictatorship that used technology to keep careful tabs on everyone and everything they did.

The other was Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley.  In his vision of the future, we turned into an idiot culture, consumed only by the desire to consume more and be endlessly entertained.

Huxley wins.

I understand Obama’s need to go on The View and chit chat during daytime TV.  And I don’t think it’s the end of the world.

But I do think it’s yet another harbinger of the kind of culture and society we are creating. And that creation isn’t driven by Obama or anyone else. They are all but respondents to the inevitable consequences of technology’s impact on culture.

In this case, the technology in question is screens.

We live in Screenworld.

We spend 8.5 hours a day staring at screens, and that number is only going to increase.

And as we stare at screens, the way that we see the world changes – rather radically.

Gail Collins in today’s NY Times comments on the impact that ‘reality stars’ have on politics.

In his pre-presidency, Obama made a guest appearance on the wrestling show “Raw” during the 2008 primaries and mimicked one of the stars, Dwayne (The Rock) Johnson. Like everybody in the pseudosport, Johnson was part of a scripted soap opera in which he played a wrestler named Dwayne (The Rock) Johnson. Among the other characters were the philandering league owner, Vince McMahon, played by owner Vince McMahon, and his long-suffering wife, Linda.

Linda McMahon is now running for the United States Senate. Dwayne Johnson is an actor who recently starred as the tooth fairy. Really.

And, of course, Barack Obama became president and appeared this week on “The View.” There, he denied knowing the identity of Snooki, who plays a woman named Snooki on “Jersey Shore,” where she recently criticized his revenue sources for health care reform.

Compared to this, “Inception” is a simple tale of people who enjoy napping.

Because fiction and fact both come to us through the same screen, we increasingly have difficulty separating the two. And worse, perahsp in the end it does not matter what is ‘real’ and what is not, so long as we continue to live in Screenworld.

The technology of fiction is so good now that it surpasses reality. And that too is only going to get better.

Zack Wilson, who works with us, sent me the link to HBO’s The Making of John Adams

Note the power of CGI.  As the technician says, ‘I defy anyone to tell me what is real and what is CGI’

YouTube Preview Image

OK.

Let’s project these three trends out a bit:

A country that gathers all its information from screens.

A technology that allows you to create pretty much anything you want on screens.

An increasing inability to differentiate entertainment from reality (even the term ‘reality’ connotes fraud now).

What kind of a world are we heading for?

One which is vastly entertaining, yet not real.

Why not start to blend CGI into politics? Into news?

I am sure this will come.

And I am equally sure it will be great entertainment and very popular.

*all credit to Neil Postman for his seminal work

Tom Guilmette Demos Some Amazine SloMo Video

By Michael Rosenblum | Published July 30th, 2010
http://www.vimeo.com/13596724

I found this through FStoppers.com, which is a new site to me, but very interesting.

That led me to Tom Guilmette‘s site.

Totally cool

Check out what he does with some very hi tech slo mo video gear.

The results are very  impressive.

Then go see Tom’s site.